The main finding
In one sentence: In 71 adults with cirrhosis caused by NASH, weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg did not significantly improve liver scarring compared with placebo after 48 weeks, with fibrosis improvement in 11% versus 29%.
Group averages, not an individual prediction. A trial result describes what happened to a defined group over a defined time.
On this page
Why this study matters
NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, now often called MASH) is fatty liver disease with inflammation. When scarring becomes severe, it is called cirrhosis. Compensated cirrhosis means the liver is heavily scarred but still doing its job. Earlier trials tested semaglutide (Wegovy, Ozempic) in people with milder scarring. This trial asked whether the same weekly 2.4 mg dose used for weight management could help once cirrhosis had developed. The answer matters for Canadian readers with advanced fatty liver disease, and it was not the answer many hoped for.
Who was in the study
The trial enrolled 71 adults between 18 June 2019 and 22 April 2021 at 38 centres in Europe and the United States. Everyone had NASH-related cirrhosis confirmed by liver biopsy (a small tissue sample) and a BMI of 27 or higher. BMI (body mass index) compares weight with height.
The mean age was 59.5 years and the mean BMI was 34.9. Of the 71 people, 49 (69%) were female and 22 (31%) were male. Most, 53 people (75%), had diabetes. Forty-seven people were assigned to semaglutide and 24 to placebo. The trial ran for 48 weeks.
What the researchers did
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Randomized means chance decided who got which treatment, in a 2:1 ratio. Double-blind means patients, doctors and the people reading the biopsies did not know who was on the medicine. Placebo means an inactive injection that looked the same. Phase 2 means a mid-sized trial designed to look for a signal, not to give a final answer. Randomization was balanced by whether people had type 2 diabetes.
People injected semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo under the skin once a week. The main outcome was the share of people whose liver fibrosis improved by at least one stage without their NASH getting worse, judged by a repeat biopsy at 48 weeks. Everyone randomized was counted (intention-to-treat). If a person's follow-up biopsy was missing, they were counted as not responding.
What they found
After 48 weeks, fibrosis improved without worse NASH in 5 of 47 people (11%) on semaglutide and 7 of 24 (29%) on placebo (R32-C38). The odds ratio was 0.28, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.06 to 1.24 and a P value of 0.087. An odds ratio below 1 points toward fewer responses with the medicine, but the confidence interval, which is the range where the true value most likely lies, stretched from well below 1 to above 1. That means the trial could not tell whether semaglutide helped, harmed or made no difference to scarring (R32-C37).
There was also no significant difference in the share of people whose NASH resolved (P = 0.29). Liver and kidney function stayed stable in both groups.
| Outcome at 48 weeks | Semaglutide 2.4 mg | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Fibrosis improved, NASH not worse | 11% (5 of 47) | 29% (7 of 24) |
| Any adverse event | 89% (42) | 79% (19) |
| Serious adverse event | 13% (6) | 8% (2) |
Side effects and people who stopped
Adverse events were reported by 42 people (89%) on semaglutide and 19 (79%) on placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 6 (13%) and 2 (8%). The most common side effects were nausea (45% versus 17%), diarrhoea (19% versus 8%) and vomiting (17% versus none). There were no liver decompensation events (such as fluid build-up or bleeding) and no deaths. Three people on semaglutide and none on placebo stopped because of adverse events; the percentages were not extracted. The authors reported no new safety concerns.
What this study does not tell you
- With 71 people, the trial was small. A wide confidence interval means it could miss a real benefit or a real harm.
- It ran for 48 weeks. The absence of decompensation in this sample does not prove long-term safety.
- Its results differ from those in people with milder fibrosis, but the populations and endpoints also differ, so the trials are not simply contradictory.
- Three quarters of participants had diabetes, so results in people without diabetes are less certain.
- It measured biopsy changes, not liver failure, transplant or death.
- The trial was funded by the maker of semaglutide.
What it means in Canada
This trial is the reason careful summaries say semaglutide's liver benefit has been shown in people with moderate to advanced scarring, not in people who already have cirrhosis. For how semaglutide is used in Canada, see semaglutide in Canada. For funding questions, see public drug coverage by province.
Common questions
Did semaglutide improve liver scarring in people with NASH cirrhosis?
No clear benefit was shown. Fibrosis improved without worse NASH in 11% on semaglutide and 29% on placebo after 48 weeks, and the wide confidence interval means the trial could not establish a difference.
How many people were in the NASH cirrhosis trial?
71 adults were enrolled: 47 received weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg and 24 received placebo. Three quarters had diabetes.
Was semaglutide safe in people with cirrhosis in this trial?
The authors reported no new safety concerns, no liver decompensation events and no deaths, but 71 people over 48 weeks is too few to prove long-term safety.
Related reading
Other studies in this library that bear on the same question.
ESSENCE: semaglutide for MASH liver disease, 72-week interim results
Semaglutide for NASH liver disease: the 2021 phase 2 trial
STEP 2: semaglutide weight loss in type 2 diabetes
Source
Original paper: Rohit Loomba, Phase 2 compensated NASH cirrhosis trial, NCT03987451, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2023. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36934740/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00068-7. Funding: The trial was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S, the company that makes semaglutide. How we summarized it: full text and extracted data.
This page explains a published study. It is not medical advice and does not describe whether a medicine is right for you. Talk to your doctor, nurse practitioner or pharmacist about your own situation. Reviewed and signed by two pharmacists registered in British Columbia, 2026-09-18.
Evidence records behind this page
Each record is a row in the clinical evidence file, taken from the published paper named above. The caution column is the limit the researcher recorded for that number.
This table scrolls sideways.
| Record | What the paper reports | Type | Population | Caution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R32-C37 | In a small trial of compensated NASH cirrhosis, weekly semaglutide did not significantly improve the biopsy fibrosis endpoint compared with placebo after 48 weeks. | direct evidence | Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH-related compensated cirrhosis and BMI ≥27; 75% had diabetes | Small phase 2 trial in cirrhosis; results differ from non-cirrhotic MASH trials but populations and endpoints differ; absence of decompensation in this sample does not prove long-term safety. | PubMed 36934740 |
| R32-C38 | Fibrosis response in that cirrhosis trial was 11% with semaglutide and 29% with placebo; the confidence interval was wide, so the trial did not establish a treatment difference. | direct evidence | Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH-related compensated cirrhosis and BMI ≥27; 75% had diabetes | Small phase 2 trial in cirrhosis; results differ from non-cirrhotic MASH trials but populations and endpoints differ; absence of decompensation in this sample does not prove long-term safety. | PubMed 36934740 |