The main finding

In one sentence: In a study of 366476 US adults having one of 14 common operations, people with a GLP-1 prescription before surgery did not have a clearly higher rate of aspiration pneumonia in the 30 days afterward (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.06).

An observational result describes what was recorded for a group of people. It does not establish that the treatment caused the difference, and it is not a prediction for one person.

On this page

Why this study matters

Before an operation under anaesthesia, people are asked to fast so the stomach is empty. If food or liquid comes back up during the procedure and enters the lungs, it can cause aspiration pneumonia, a serious lung infection. GLP-1 medicines such as semaglutide (Wegovy, Ozempic) and liraglutide (Saxenda, Victoza) slow stomach emptying, so anaesthesia teams have worried that people taking them could still have food in the stomach after fasting. This concern has led to guidelines about withholding these medicines before surgery. This study tested whether the worry showed up as more pneumonia in real surgical patients. Canadian readers who take a GLP-1 medicine and are planning an operation will find it relevant.

Who was in the study

The study included 366476 adults who had one of 14 common surgical procedures between April 1, 2020 and September 30, 2022, using MarketScan commercial insurance claims in the United States. People were excluded if they were under 18, had more than one procedure, or had pneumonia or acute respiratory failure in the 90 days before surgery.

The median age was 53 years (interquartile range 43 to 62), and 56.4% were women. Of the whole group, 5931 people (1.6%) had a prescription for a GLP-1 receptor agonist before surgery. Compared with non-users, GLP-1 users were more likely to be female (59.0% versus 56.4%) and much more likely to have both obesity and diabetes recorded (47.5% versus 6.8%). Outcomes were measured over the 30 days after surgery.

What the researchers did

This was a retrospective cohort study, meaning the researchers looked back at existing insurance records. No one was assigned to a treatment by chance. The researchers compared people who had a GLP-1 prescription before surgery with people who did not.

The main outcome was aspiration pneumonia in the 30-day period after the operation. The researchers used multivariable logistic regression, a statistical method that adjusts for differences between the groups such as age, sex, other health conditions and the type of surgery. Results are given as an odds ratio. An odds ratio compares the chance of an event in one group with the chance in another. A value of 1 means no difference.

What they found

After adjustment, the odds of aspiration pneumonia were not significantly different between GLP-1 users and non-users. The adjusted odds ratio was 0.78, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.57 to 1.06 (R32-C126). A confidence interval is the range in which the true value is likely to sit. Because the range crosses 1, the study did not find a clear increase or decrease. The P value was 0.12, meaning the difference could easily be due to chance.

The summary we reviewed does not report how many people in each group actually developed aspiration pneumonia.

The authors conclude that they found no significant association between GLP-1 use before surgery and short-term aspiration pneumonia, and suggest it may be worth reassessing guidelines that recommend pausing these medicines before surgery.

Side effects and people who stopped

This study measured aspiration pneumonia only. It does not report other complications or side effects, and it does not report whether people stopped or paused their medicine before surgery.

What this study does not tell you

  • Having a prescription is not the same as taking the medicine. The claims data could not show whether people were still taking their GLP-1 medicine on the day of surgery, or whether they had paused it as their care team advised.
  • The records do not show how severe any aspiration event was, and mild cases may not have been coded.
  • GLP-1 users were a small share of the cohort (1.6%), which limits the precision of the estimate. The confidence interval does not rule out a small increase in risk.
  • The 14 procedures were common operations. Finding no association here does not mean every type of procedure or anaesthesia is safe.
  • This is an observational study, and differences between users and non-users that were not measured could affect the result.
  • The summary we reviewed does not state who funded the study.

What it means in Canada

For Canadian readers, this study is one piece of evidence that GLP-1 use was not linked to more aspiration pneumonia after common surgery. It does not answer whether pausing the medicine before an operation is needed, because it could not tell who had paused. That decision sits with the surgical and anaesthesia team together with the prescriber. See the page on multisociety guidance for GLP-1 medicines before surgery. For how these medicines are used in Canada, see semaglutide in Canada and tirzepatide in Canada.

Common questions

Do GLP-1 medicines increase aspiration pneumonia after surgery?

In this study of 366476 US surgical patients, the adjusted odds ratio for aspiration pneumonia within 30 days was 0.78 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.06) for GLP-1 users versus non-users, which is no clear difference.

How many surgical patients in the study were taking a GLP-1 medicine?

5931 patients, or 1.6% of the cohort, had a prescription for a GLP-1 medicine before surgery.

Does this study mean it is safe to keep taking a GLP-1 medicine before surgery?

No. The study could not confirm whether people actually took the medicine or paused it before surgery, and the authors say only that withholding guidelines may need to be reassessed.

Other studies in this library that bear on the same question.

Source

Original paper: Yuan-Hsin Chen, US common-surgery aspiration pneumonia cohort, JAMA network open, 2025. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40036031/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0081. Funding: The summary we reviewed does not state the funding source. How we summarized it: full text and extracted data.

This page explains a published study. It is not medical advice and does not describe whether a medicine is right for you. Talk to your doctor, nurse practitioner or pharmacist about your own situation. Reviewed and signed by two pharmacists registered in British Columbia, 2026-09-18.

Evidence records behind this page

Each record is a row in the clinical evidence file, taken from the published paper named above. The caution column is the limit the researcher recorded for that number.

Claim-level source records for this page
RecordWhat the paper reportsTypePopulationCautionSource
R32-C126A US study of 366476 surgical patients found no clear increase in postoperative aspiration pneumonia among those prescribed a GLP-1 medicine; it could not determine the best medication plan for an individual procedure.direct evidenceUS adults undergoing one of 14 common operationsClaims cannot fully resolve actual dosing, withholding or aspiration severity; absence of association is not proof that every procedural setting is safe.PubMed 40036031